Legal Opinion

Joseph Barber v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2019No. ED106123PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO JOSEPH BARBER, ) No. ED106123 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) the City of St. Louis vs. ) ) Honorable Mark H. Neill STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent. ) Filed: February 26, 2019 Introduction Joseph Barber (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 post- conviction relief motion. Because we do not have a sufficient record to review the motion court’s inquiry into abandonment, we reverse and remand for the motion court to make a sufficient record of the inquiry into abandonment. Factual and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. McDaris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Lampkin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alonzo Showalter v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Barber v. HancockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  4. Christopher Schilling, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Clayton D. Reehten v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API