Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Murray v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 2, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

CASE 41. — ACTION BY A. W. MURRAY, SR., AGAINST CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY OE KENTUCKY AND THE CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. Appeal from Greenup Circuit Court. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Wm. Rogers Clay, Commissioner.

Plaintiff, A. ~W. Murray, Sr., instituted this action against the defendants,. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company of Kentucky and the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, to recover damages for personal injuries. A demurrer was sustained to the petition and the petition was dismissed. To test the validity of this ruling the plaintiff appeals.

The petition is as follows:

“Plaintiff states that on or about June 1, 1906, the defendant, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company of Kentucky, a consolidated corporation composed of the Big Sandy R. R. Co.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lexington Ry. Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Lou. & Nash. R. R. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington R. R. v. Case's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Strong v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Welch v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Benke's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API