In re Lefkowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the Second Department on March 18,1955, but has, at all times relevant to these proceedings, maintained his office in the First Judicial Department. After a hearing on three charges, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (d) for an order confirming findings of fact and conclusions of law, and further recommends that we direct respondent’s suspension from the practice of law for a period of five years. Respondent cross-moves for an order disaffirming the Disciplinary Committee’s report and…
3Cited by6 opinions
- ATTORNEY U v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- In re KreitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re JochnowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Matter of CaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of CaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.