Legal Opinion

Essex Insurance Company v. Kasten Railcar Services, Inc., and Robert R. Riley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 19, 1997No. 97-1760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

A guard dog owned by defendant Kasten Railcar Services bit defendant Riley, resulting in a claim by Riley against Kasten that the latter asked its liability insurer, the plaintiff in this case, to cover. The insurer refused, pointing to the “canine exclusion” in the policy, and brought this suit (a diversity suit, governed by Illinois law) for a declaratory judgment of no coverage. The district judge thought the policy ambiguous, and submitted the case to a jury, which found for the insurance company.

Riley had obtained a substantial judgment against Kasten for the injury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Indiana Insurance v. Hydra Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Rivota v. KaplanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Ashland Oil, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nautilus Insurance v. ReuterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Northland Insurance v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003
  3. Nautilus Insur Co v. Reuter, DavidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API