Legal Opinion

Straus v. Weil

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

EROM MONTSOMERY. At the September Term, 1866, there was a judgment in this case, by default, and a jury impaneled, to inquire and fix the sum the plaintiff was entitled to, who rendered a verdict for the amount claimed, and interest thereon, upon which the Court gave judgment. Defendant appealed. Judge John Alex. Campbell, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Edward H. East, Special Judge,

^delivered the opinion of the Court.

Weil took an attachment against the property of Straus, for an alleged indebtedness of $1,283. This writ was issued by a Magistrate, upon an affidavit, alleging that the defendant, (Straus,) “was about to remove himself and property, or is about to remove his property, beyond the limits of the State, so as to defeat him, (plaintiff,) in the collection of his debt.” This attachment was levied upon the real and personal estate of the defendant, and the latter was, by him, replevied. . The papers in the cause were returned to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haight v. HolleyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Moore v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1808
  3. D. & N. Arnold v. TallmadgeNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. M'Cartee v. ChambersNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanley v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API