Legal Opinion

Moore v. Morton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 22, 1808PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Trimble.

— It will only be necessary to consider the 3d assignment of error, which is that “ the judgment upon,, sustaining the demurrer to the plea to the writ, ought to have been (quod respondeat ouster) that the defendant answer over, &c. instead of a judgment in chief.”

Barnett Moore, who was defendant in the court below, and upon whom a capias ad respondendum requiring bail, had been executed in the county of Bracken, ancj bail taken of him for his appearance in Bracken circuit court ; after craving oyer ot the writ, pleaded a plea, in nature of a plea in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alling v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  2. Mayfield v. BarnardMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Myers & Waterson v. Hunter Erwin & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Straus v. WeilTennessee Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Pomeroy v. ManinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1842

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API