Moore v. Morton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the Court, by
Judge Trimble.
— It will only be necessary to consider the 3d assignment of error, which is that “ the judgment upon,, sustaining the demurrer to the plea to the writ, ought to have been (quod respondeat ouster) that the defendant answer over, &c. instead of a judgment in chief.”
Barnett Moore, who was defendant in the court below, and upon whom a capias ad respondendum requiring bail, had been executed in the county of Bracken, ancj bail taken of him for his appearance in Bracken circuit court ; after craving oyer ot the writ, pleaded a plea, in nature of a plea in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Alling v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Mayfield v. BarnardMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
- Myers & Waterson v. Hunter Erwin & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1851
- Straus v. WeilTennessee Supreme Court · 1867
- Pomeroy v. ManinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1842
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.