Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1977No. 76-827PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The main issue raised in the instant cause is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it excluded the testimony of the three defense witnesses concerning the whereabouts of the defendant and his girl friend from roughly 9:00 p. m. to 1:00 a. m. on October 16,1974.2

*53Crim. E. 12.1 provides:

“Whenever a defendant in a criminal case proposes to offer testimony to establish an alibi on his behalf, he shall, not less than seven days before trial, file and serve upon the prosecuting attorney a notice in writing of his intention to claim alibi. The notice shall include specific information…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. ThayerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. AdairArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. NooksOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. ShiderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Jamison v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API