Crosby-Garbotz v. Fell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STARING, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 In this special action, we conclude the doctrine of collateral estoppel, also *1114known as issue preclusion, does not bar the State of Arizona from prosecuting a person for child abuse after a juvenile court found in a separate dependency action that he did not abuse the child in question and dismissed a dependency petition that was based solely on that alleged abuse. Consequently, the respondent judge did not err in denying petitioner Nikolas Crosby-Garbotz's2 motion to dismiss the underlying criminal action.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 The following facts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crosby-Garbotz v. Hon. fell/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2019