Legal Opinion

Miller Franklin & Co. v. Gentry

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover $2788, being the balance claimed to be due plaintiff for expenses incurred and paid in making a survey of the business of Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company. The cause was tried before the court without a jury. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff's position in this court is that under the law and the uncontroverted facts the judgment should have been for plaintiff, and that this court should reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause with directions to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount sued for.

Plaintiff'…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  4. Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Chicago Deposit Vault Co. v. McNultaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ChiraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2006
  2. United Builders, Inc. v. HalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API