Legal Opinion

Brock & Scott Produce Co. v. Brock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

On 1 May, 1922, the defendant gave to Swift & Company a sixty-day note for $380 in payment for certain commercial fertilizers which he had purchased from said Swift & Company through its agent, Brock & Scott Produce Company. This note was endorsed, or payment guaranteed, by Brock & Scott Produce Company. The present action is to enforce collection of said note, default having been made in the payment of same at maturity and after demand.

The basis of the defendant’s demurrer is that there is a misjoinder, both of parties plaintiff and of causes of action, and for this position he relies upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Thigpen v. Kinston Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. R. L. Davies & Co. v. BrombergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API