Legal Opinion

Neal v. Ardoin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1979No. 17559PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This is a suit by a court reporter (Neal) against an attorney (Ardoin) for court reporting fees totalling $2,163.82 representing services rendered in eight different cases.

Trial was to the court which rendered judgment for Neal for $141.30 for services rendered in only one case, that being one in which Ardoin was a party defendant. The court assessed half the court costs against each party, and awarded attorney fees of $75.00 to Neal.

The court filed findings of fact that Ar-doin, as attorney of record, requested and received the services in question. The court filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graham v. McCarty & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Siepert v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Nagle v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. City of Arlington v. Dallas-Fort Worth Safety Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Finlay v. Olive, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Allen v. Crabtree, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  4. Eppler, Guerin & Turner, Inc. v. Kasmir, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  5. Perez v. Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API