Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Palmer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 1988No. 3-86-0807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The defendant husband, Frank W. Palmer, appeals from the trial court’s order of compensatory damages to the plaintiff wife, Mary Jane Palmer. We affirm.

The wife sought damages for her injuries resulting from the husband’s allegedly intentional collision with a bridge abutment and/or his allegedly beating her after the collision. The events underlying this case occurred before dissolution of the parties’ marriage. The husband was driving when their car collided with a bridge abutment. The passenger wife apparently suffered a broken neck and other injuries.

On remand following an interlocutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Both v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Leahy v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Pruitt v. Motor Cargo, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Anderson v. KrancicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rios v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Marxmiller v. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. Williams v. ConnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API