State ex rel. Donofrio v. Humes
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Talhnan, J., entered March 2, 1903, upon sustaining a demurrer to affirmative defenses in an answer, in a proceeding for a mandamus to compel city officials to issue a warrant in satisfaction of a judgment against the city.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
The respondents in this appeal, who were the relators below, applied to the superior court for a writ of mandate directed to the respondents below, who are the appellants here. The affidavit in support of the application for the writ states, in substance, that on the 30th day of January, 1902, in an action entitled “In the Matter of the Petition of the City of Seattle, Condemnation Proceedings under Ordinance No. 6041, Rainier Avenue, Cause *349No. 29,945,” then pending in the superior court of King county, such proceedings were had that a judgment was rendered in favor of the relators, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Plum v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- North Coast Railroad v. AumillerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Yesler Logging Co. v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.