Legal Opinion
In Re Kotey M.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 18, 2009No. 2008-705PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The instant appeal is before the court on interlocutory transfer without ruling. See SUP. CT. R. 9. We accept the facts as presented in the interlocutory transfer. See McDonald v. Town of Effingham Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.H. 171, 172 (2005). The juvenile, Kotey M., was born in June 1997 and is now eleven years old. He was the subject of a petition alleging that he was a child in need of services (CHINS) because of acts he purportedly committed in 2007 and 2008. The juvenile was placed at Pinehaven School by agreement of the parties on a pending delinquency petition. After the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re C.M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. HESS CORP.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In Re StapletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. ReaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.