Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re B.L.H.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 2008No. COA07-1313-2Published

1DissentSteelman, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority. I would hold that, because Chapter 7B is silent on the matter, Rule 15 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure permits the amendment of the petition in conformity with the evidence.

I. Additional Facts

The hearing of this matter was conducted on two separate days, 16 May 2007 and 4 June 2007. The first witness for the Department of Social Services ("DSS") was Andrea Biffle, a social worker employed by DSS. During Ms. Biffle's testimony, DSS moved to amend its pleadings to conform to the evidence and add an additional grounds for termination:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. In re S.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API