Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Challenging his conviction for second degree conspiracy, defendant contends that the People’s proof was legally insufficient to prove that he entered into an illicit agreement to sell cocaine. Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, we conclude that the evidence established that, on a number of occasions, defendant and codefendant traveled to New York City to purchase drugs to sell from a residence in Niagara Falls; that defendant, codefendant, and others acting on their behalf sold drugs from that residence; and that defendant received a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. TiradoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. ComfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. GivensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. BoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API