Legal Opinion

People v. Clarke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contentions that the People failed to present sufficient evidence to corroborate the accomplice testimony (see, CPL 60.22; People v Campbell, 187 AD2d 945, lv denied 81 NY2d 786) and that the People failed to present evidence legally sufficient to support the verdict. We further conclude that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

Finally, there is no merit to the contention that the trial court erred in reinstating the last count of the indictment charging criminal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DaggettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. BigwarfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. DAGGETT, RONALD C., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API