Legal Opinion
Dohoney v. Imperial Ins. Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1952No. 1183PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
'Appellees, plaintiffs below, sued for damages resulting from an automobile collision. Defendant filed a counterclaim for his damages. Sitting without a jury, the trial court found for plaintiffs On both claims and. this appeal follows.
The 'collision occurred at the intersection of Rhode Island and- Eastern' Avenues, N. E. Rhode Island Avenue is- very wide at 'this junction. It runs approximately east and west. Eastern Avenue runs north and south, ánd there is a stop sign on Eastern Avenue about two car-lengths south o.f the south curb of Rhode Island Avenue making the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shu v. BasingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Brown v. ClancyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Lewis v. ShiffersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Raaen v. Southern Hotel Supply Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1942
- Scott v. Wilson ex rel. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spain v. McNealDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rawlings v. RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- McKnight v. BradshawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Abel v. First Security Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Du Bose v. DrummondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.