Rawlings v. Robbins
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This appeal concerns an intersectional collision which occurred during rush-hour traffic. When plaintiff brought suit, the defendant counterclaimed, and intervenor, State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., subro-gated in part to defendant’s claim, asserted its rights against the plaintiff. The trial court sitting with a jury directed a verdict against the plaintiff at the close of his case on the grounds that plaintiff failed to prove the negligence of the defendant as a matter of law, and that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We construe this latter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Carter v. SingletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Lee W. Todd v. Albert JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Dohoney v. Imperial Ins. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spain v. McNealDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- District of Columbia v. FrickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Harris v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Overby v. BarnettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Arlington Yellow Cab Co. v. SutterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.