Legal Opinion

Rawlings v. Robbins

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1969No. 4645PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This appeal concerns an intersectional collision which occurred during rush-hour traffic. When plaintiff brought suit, the defendant counterclaimed, and intervenor, State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., subro-gated in part to defendant’s claim, asserted its rights against the plaintiff. The trial court sitting with a jury directed a verdict against the plaintiff at the close of his case on the grounds that plaintiff failed to prove the negligence of the defendant as a matter of law, and that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We construe this latter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Carter v. SingletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Lee W. Todd v. Albert JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  5. Dohoney v. Imperial Ins. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spain v. McNealDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. District of Columbia v. FrickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Harris v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Overby v. BarnettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Arlington Yellow Cab Co. v. SutterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API