Legal Opinion

Carr v. Mile High Kennel Club

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 10, 1952No. 16683PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

On the 28th day of September, 1949, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, filed this action in damages against the defendant, a Colorado corporation, which owns and operates a stadium and racecourse at 62nd avenue and Colorado Boulevard, where races are run on which parimutuel wagers are made.

Plaintiff alleges that on the 4th day of August, 1949, at about 8:30 o’clock P. M., he was occupying a reserved seat, which he had purchased, next to an aisle in the grandstand; that for the purpose of going to a parimutuel window, to make a wager, he arose from his seat and stepped out into the aisle,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Snyder v. Colorado Springs & Cripple Creek District Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. California Jockey Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Richter v. Adobe Creek LodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Hildebrandt v. University of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Kaffel v. Cloverleaf Kennel ClubColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Richter v. Adobe Creek LodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API