Marchuk v. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge:
After Plaintiff rested her case, Defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) as to all Defendants on all claims. For the following reasons, and the reasons stated on the record during the oral argument on January 23, 2015, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part,
LEGAL STANDARD
Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 permits a court to “enter judgment as a matter of law when a party has been fully heard on an issue during a jury trial and the court…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bouveng v. NYG Capital LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Day & Zimmerman NPS, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Ariz v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Carvalho Calvelos v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Christopher J. Godfrey v. State of Iowa, Terry Branstad, Governor of the State of Iowa, in His Official Capacity, Brenna Findley, Legal Counsel to the Governor of the State of Iowa, in Her Official CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.