Legal Opinion

Bynacker v. McMichael

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 11, 1967No. 48628PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Justice:

Limited Certiorari was granted in this matter in order that we might determine the correctness of that part of the Court of Appeal’s decision which affirmed a part of the trial court’s judgment holding that in the partition proceedings between Ethelyn G. Bynacker and Bernard E. McMichael the latter did not have to render an accounting for bonuses or “bonus salary” *658received from George Engine Company, Inc. during the period May 9, 1958-January 27, 1961. Art. VII, Sec. 11, La.Const. of 1921; La.App., 194 So.2d 335; 250 La. 472, 196 So.2d 535.

We restricted our hearing to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Thigpen v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Tanner v. TannerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Beatty v. ViningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lane v. LaneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. ShippSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  3. Bazile v. Arnaud Coffee Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Bynacker v. McMichaelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Burger v. BurgerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API