Legal Opinion

Atlantic Casualty Insurance v. Greytak

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2015No. OP 14-0412PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 This matter comes to the Court pursuant to M. R. App. P. 15 on a question of Montana law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:

Whether, in a case involving a claim of damages by a third party, an insurer who does not receive timely notice according to the terms of an insurance policy must demonstrate prejudice from the lack of notice to avoid defense and indemnification of the insured.

This Court accepted the certified question by Order of July 8,2014, and the parties and several amid curiae have filed briefs.

¶2 We answer the question: yes.

BACKGROUND

¶3…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Steadele v. Colony InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Newman v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. BNSF Railway Co. v. CringleMontana Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Century Surety Company v. Jim Hipner, LLC and Huey BrockWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Contractors Bonding & Ins. Co. v. SandrockDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018
  3. Atlantic Casualty Insurance v. GreytakMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Baadsgaard v. Safeco Insurance Company of IllinoisDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
  5. Banjosa Hospitality, LLC v. Hiscox, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API