Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cusimano v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1929No. 10,930Published

1DissentJanvier, J.

My inability to concur in the opinion of my associates results from my unwillingness to accept as correct the interpretation placed by them upon the decision of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the matter entitled Hopkins vs. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61, 90 So. 512, 19 A.L.R. 1362.

In the petition in the present case the only allegation of negligence was that the car had moved as plaintiff was alighting. The trial judge found against plaintiff on this point. In his opinion given on application for a new trial he said:

“On the whole, I find it to be a. fact that the car did not move…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & PowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. LeBlanc v. SweetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Veith v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Adkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API