Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Corwin
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 11, 1936No. 6657PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the three separate defenses contained in the defendant’s answer herein upon the ground that they are insufficient in law. The action was brought by plaintiff, as receiver of the Ozone Park National Bank of New York, to recover from the defendant, a stockholder of said bank, the amount of a stock assessment levied by the comptroller of the currency.
■ For his first defense, defendant alleges that the orders and statutes by virtue of which the Ozone Park National Bank of New York was closed, and its business suspended, on March 4, 1933, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
- Sneeden v. City of Marion, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- City of East Cleveland v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Munro v. PostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Smith v. WitherowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Munro v. PostDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938