Legal Opinion

Weber v. Baessler

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

This action is for the possession of personal property. The cause was submitted to the court below on the following agreed statement of facts:

On June 1, 1889, Thursie & Anderson, who were partners doing a retail shoe business in the city of Denver, ordered from the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, who were partners engaged in manufacturing and selling at wholesale shoes, in Buffalo, New York, a bill of shoes, amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $297.

The plaintiffs, Baessler & Co., filled the order and shipped the same June 19, 1889, by railroad freight to Thursie & Anderson at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckley v. Furniss & StickneyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Morris v. ShryockMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  3. More, Reynolds & Co. v. LottNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Kingman & Co. v. DenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Clark v. BartlettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re M. Burke & Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API