Legal Opinion

Clark v. Bartlett

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winneiago County. Replevin, for a quantity of goods. The cause was tried by the court, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant Smrmer Bartlett appealed. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. For the appellant there was a brief by Weisbrod db BLar-shaw, and oral argument by Mr. Weisbrod. For the respondents there was a brief by Finch ds Barber, and oral argument by Mr. Barber.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, J.

There is no material conflict in the testimony, and it fully sustains the findings of fact. It appears that in April, 1879, the plaintiffs, “ Clark Bros.,” being wholesale merchants in New York, by their traveling agent, Courtney, agreed to sell and ship from New York to the defendants Boles & Hull, at Oshkosh, certain hats and caps, to be in accordance with samples then exhibited. Previous to the shipment of the goods, Boles & Hull had some correspondence with Courtney in regard to their financial affairs. The substance of the correspondence was, that Courtney, having heard rumors concerning…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sturtevant v. . OrserNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weber v. BaesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Weber v. BaesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API