Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1978No. 7826SC166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendant presents 14 arguments on this appeal, and we find no error- for the reasons stated. He first contends, in three assignments of error, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of pretrial and in-court identifications of defendant by Jenkins, Hasty, and Sutton. He maintains that the pretrial procedures were improperly suggestive and that the in-court identifications were based on the improper procedures and were not of independent origin. We do not agree.

First, as to the in-court identifications of defendant, even if we were to assume that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BartowsheskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. State v. RebeteranoUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API