Legal Opinion

State v. Rebeterano

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1984No. 18428PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The defendant, Rudy Rebeterano, was tried and convicted of second degree murder. On appeal he contends: (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict of guilty, and (2) that the trial court erred in admitting the results of the defendant’s polygraph examination, which the parties had stipulated would be admissible.

I. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE

In an attack on the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. State v. Garcia, Utah, 663 P.2d 60 (1983); State v. Petree,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. PetreeUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. State v. LungWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. FainIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raphello Harris, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API