Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Greex

The plaintiff in error was indicted under chapter 117 of the Acts of 1925 denouncing' the driving of an automobile on the public highways of the State by a person under the influence of an intoxicant. He was found guilty and his punishment fixed at thirty days in the county workhouse.

The first assignment of error is that the evidence preponderates against the verdict of the jury. "We have discussed the facts orally and it is sufficient to say that we think the verdict and judgment below were fully sustained by the proof.

It is also assigned for error that the trial judge improperly permitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. The People v. . EastwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Dowdy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Edwards v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Daniels v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hopson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. McMinn v. MurrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Godsey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. BarrowNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API