Legal Opinion

Oak Rubber Co. v. Bank One, N.A.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 26, 2002No. 5:02-cv-00416PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

On March 12, 2002, Defendant Bank One filed a motion for summary judgment [Doc. 8], On July 3, 2002, Plaintiffs The Oak Rubber Company and Oak Tennessee, Inc. (collectively “Oak Rubber”) filed their motion for summary judgment [Doc. 102]. The parties oppose each others motion. Because there are few material facts at issue and most of the plaintiffs’ claims fail as a matter of law, the Court grants the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all but two of the plaintiffs’ claims. Because there is an issue of material fact regarding the plaintiffs’ claim concerning…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mp Totalcare Services, Inc. v. MattimoeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Handel's Enterprises, Inc. v. SchulenburgDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Handel's Enterprises, Inc. v. SchulenburgDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. MTD Products Inc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API