Legal Opinion

Shoenberg v. Lodenkemper's Ex'r

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 21, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Sant, Commissioner

Reversing.

Rose Lodenkemper, by will, made certain specific bequests which are not in controversy. She disposed of the residue of her estate in Item VI of the will which provides: “All the rest and residue of my estate, real, personal and mixed and wherever situated, I give, bequeath and devise to Rudy J. Bouteiller, Lula Bouteiller, Anna Sauter, Josephine Bouteiller, Pauline Rusterholtz, Eleanora Porteous, Rosa Buddell, Marie Hamlin, Ethel Higgins, 624 E. Walnut St., Louisville, Kentucky, Mrs. Ida Schulten, 522 East Walnut St., Louisville, Ky., Mrs. Georgina McCormick,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. StambaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  2. McLeod v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Chrisman v. AllmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  4. Horseman v. HorsemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Trent v. GriffyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Creech v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Roth v. StaubleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  3. Jarrett v. EltzerothSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Church v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  5. Gullett v. Gullett's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API