Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Littler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Wapello Ci/rcwit Court. Action at law. The cause was tried to the court below without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The action is upon a bond executed by Littler as principal, and the other defendants as sureties, conditioned that Littler shall pay to plaintiff all his indebtedness to it, existing or afterward to exist, whether upon notes, accounts, or in any other manner. The petition alleges that Littler became agent of plaintiff for the sale of sewing machines, and the bond in silit was executed, when he was .appointed, to secure plaintiff from loss that might accrue on account of his employment. The petition alleges that Littler became delinquent in his payments and executed a note to plaintiff,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. LaRose v. Logansport National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Musgrove v. Luther Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. WinchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. First National Bank of Crandon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Page v. White Sewing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API