Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 3, 2013No. AC 34557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The principal issue in this criminal appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that the dry firing of a handgun1 is sufficient evidence to show *846its operability for the purpose of satisfying the elements of the crime of criminal possession of a firearm under General Statutes § 53a-217 (a) (l).2 Secondarily, we must decide whether the trial court properly invited the state to reopen its case when the state neglected to qualify a witness as an expert. On both issues, we agree with the trial court’s rulings and therefore affirm its judgment finding the defendant guilty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. State v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. State v. CarpenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. State v. LopesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EnriquezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  3. State v. EnriquezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State v. EnriquezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. JarmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API