Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gist

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1969No. Appeal, 397PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellant is trying for the third time to collaterally attack his conviction of first degree murder. In his two prior attempts he was unrepresented; now he has counsel. After a hearing below, appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act petition was denied and appellant took this appeal.

Appellant first claims that he was not told of his right to appeal with counsel guaranteed by Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963). The Commonwealth agrees that since the trial record is silent on the issue of waiver, it has the burden of proving that appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. RitcheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. EzellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Smith v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. MaloySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API