Legal Opinion

Ross v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 9, 1959No. 47266PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYDE, Presiding Judge.

Action by persons engaged in business of installing, repairing and replacing warm air furnaces to declare unconstitutional an ordinance amending the Building Code of Kansas City, to provide for regulating the warm air heating business, and to permanently enjoin its enforcement. The court dismissed plaintiffs’ petition with prejudice, in accordance with the prayer of defendant’s answer, and plaintiffs have appealed. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, on the ground of noncompliance with Rule 1.08, Supreme Court Rules, 42 V.A.M.S., but we have decided to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McKaig v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Ludlow v. GuffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Williams v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  4. Fairmont Inv. Co., Inc. v. WoermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. City of St. Louis v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 508 Chestnut, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. McClellan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Ruggeri v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. ITT Lyndon Life Insurance Co. v. CristMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API