Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Guigler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1995No. 3-94-0626PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

The plaintiffs, Ralph and Rema Armstrong (Armstrongs), sued the defendants, real estate brokers Walter Guigler, Russell Smith and Robert Smith, d/b/a The Bob Smith Agency (the brokers), for breach of an implied duty arising out of a written listing contract. The trial court held that the Armstrongs’ action fell within the five-year statute of limitations applicable to breaches of fiduciary duty. We hold that when a fiduciary relationship is created in a written document, claims for a breach of fiduciary duty are governed by the 10-year statute of limitations for written contracts.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patricia Burdett v. Robert S. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Arthur Rubloff & Co. v. Drovers National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Luminall Paints, Inc. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Anderson v. DossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. GuiglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Armstrong v. GuiglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Armstrong v. GuiglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Armstrong v. GuiglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API