Legal Opinion

USX Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1992No. 736 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

USX Corporation (USX) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision awarding Mark McDermott (McDermott) partial disability benefits. USX argues that the referee erred when computing McDermott’s average weekly wage by inflating McDermott’s earnings from a second employer. McDermott argues that the referee erred by deflating the earnings from the second employer. Because neither party’s argument has been properly preserved for review, we affirm.

The referee made the following determinations of fact.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Tomczak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Long v. ThomasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Schriver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Department of Transportation)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Lancaster General Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API