Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Crawford

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 4, 1932No. 5405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a deeree in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing, after hearing, plaintiff’s bill (filed May 11, 1929), praying that premises No. 218 Indiana Avenue N.W. (lot 14, in Smith So Marr’s subdivision of square south of square 572) be impressed with a trust for her benefit in the sum of $6,500, less $1,127.57.

The material facts found by the court below are substantially as follows: On May 10, 1927, plaintiff, being the owner of the premises in question, entered into a contract of sale with the defendant Francis A. Crawford through a Mr. Lewis as Crawford’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bloomer v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Holman v. RyonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Knowles v. MosherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Salas v. BrekelmansDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API