Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Carolina-Portland Cement Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The suit is by appellant against the appellee seeking a recovery of damages for breach of contract. As last amended, the plaintiff stated his case in nine counts. Defendant’s demurrer was sustained to each count, and on account of such adverse ruling on the pleadings, plaintiff took a nonsuit and prosecutes this appeal for a review thereof. J. E. Paterson is the assignee of this chose in action, the Paterson Lumber Company being the assignor, and the suit is properly brought in the name of the Paterson Lumber Company for the use and benefit of said assignee. Snead v. Bell, 142 Ala. 449, 38…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- Forthman v. DetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Robinson v. DrummondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. BarteeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Quality Truck and Auto Sales, Inc. v. YassineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte RushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Perry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.