Legal Opinion
State v. Michael Sumulikoski / State v. Artur Sopel (072957)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 18, 2015No. A-3/4-13Published
1Opinion of the Court
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State of New Jersey v. Michael Sumulikoski; State of New Jersey v. Artur Sopel (A-3/4-13) (072957) Argued September 24, 2014 -- Decided March 18, 2015 PER CURIAM In this appeal, the Court considers whether the State can prosecute offenses that occurred in Germany in a New Jersey…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.