Legal Opinion

Exchange Bank & Trust Co. v. Bartley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1944No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Hughes,

The appellants petitioned to open a judgment confessed on a mortgage bond. The mortgaged premises were owned by Ruth Hoefner Bartley, subject to the curtesy interest of her father, J. Henry Hoefner, in one-half thereof. Ruth Hoefner Bartley acquired one-half of the property by descent from her mother, subject to her father’s curtesy interest, and the other half was devised to her by her uncle, Milo L. McMurray. McMurray died on September 11, 1921, but prior to his death, on March 12,1920, the Franklin Trust Company confessed judgment on a note of $10,000.00 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eby v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. People's Bank v. StroudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Reidlinger v. CameronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Spritzer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nissenbaum v. FarleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Chidsey v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Adasiak v. Cyback, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1982
  4. Berger v. Pittsburgh Auto Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Berger v. Pittsburgh Auto Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API