McKee v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Presiding Judge.
Introduction
Tracy McKee (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief, because his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to request an instruction for the lesser-included offense of second-degree tampering. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
On January 30, 2008, a jury convicted Movant of tampering in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.080.1(2) RSMo Supp.2005. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Becker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Demarco McCrady, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Taqwa Thompson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Garvester Bracken, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Romell Bates v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.