Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 6, 2008No. Case CV 04-08400-SGL (RZx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER REGARDING RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL FOR REMAINING ISSUES

STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.

With the filing of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (and the Court granting plaintiffs leave to do so), there are only five claims left to try before the Court: A state law claim for unfair competition and unfair business practices in violation of California Civil Code § 17200 et seq.; declaratory relief that plaintiffs have successfully terminated the grant to the copyright in various Superman works; and three claims requesting an accounting of profits. In addition, there is a secondary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vance v. LatimerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Jl Beverage Company, LLC v. Beam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Zhu v. LiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API