Legal Opinion

People's Savings Bank v. Raines

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

Appellant insists that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in its favor.

This appeal involves the construction of § 7960, C. & M. Digest, which provides:

“Section 7960. No note hereafter given for premiums on insurance in this State shall ¡be negotiable until the policy for which said note was given as payment for premium thereon shall have been issued and delivered to the maker of said note, and all note's so given shall state for what purpose the noté was given; provided that, if a policy shall be issued in the form applied for, and the maker of any such note shall refuse to take…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County Nat. Bank of LibertySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Remmel v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Carrigan v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Gray v. StoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Woods v. CarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deaton v. ViseTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Imperial Savings Ass'n v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1990
  3. Nossaman v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. H. G. Pugh & Co. v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Reliance Life Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API