Legal Opinion
State v. D.C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 31, 2013No. 5D11-3311PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The State appeals the trial court’s order dismissing the information filed against D.C. (defendant). Determining that the information sufficiently alleges unlawful *441sexual intercourse by a person knowingly infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), we reverse.
The defendant was charged with one count of unlawful sexual intercourse by a person knowingly infected with HIV, as prohibited by sections 384.24(2) and 384.34(5), Florida Statutes (2008). The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the information, contending that sexual intercourse, as that term is used in section 384.24(2),…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. HorowitchSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Bautista v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gary G. Debaun v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Macchione v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Wilkerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- State v. DebaunDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Ramroop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.