Legal Opinion

People v. Derby

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1960No. Crim. 2979PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Ronald Eugene Derby was found guilty by a jury of violating section 148 of the Penal Code (resisting a public officer in the discharge of the duties of his office). His motion for a new trial was denied. He was granted probation and this appeal followed.

The facts as shown by the record are as follows:

Officers Stanley E. Scott and Carl W. Forsmann entered the parking lot of the California Highway Patrol in Red Bluff about 2:30 a.m., November 22, 1958. They were about to end their tour of duty and return to their homes. As they stepped from the patrol car they heard sounds of a struggle and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. Leong FookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Kick v. MerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Deborah C.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. CoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In re CulverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Long v. ValentinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API