Legal Opinion
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 1, 1986No. 81-09-01252PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WATSON, Judge:
This case arises from the importation during 1975 to 1977 of metal articles manufactured in Japan and used in the construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System. These articles were part of a structure known as an anchor support module, which was specially designed to support a pipeline off the ground while allowing a degree of flexibility sufficient to prevent the stresses of seismic activity and thermal movement from causing damage to the pipeline.
The specific items imported were “framing”, “saddle clamps”, “sliding plates” and the nuts, bolts,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schering Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Delphi Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.