Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Watson, Judge:
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for a rehearing under Rule 59 of the Rules of this court. In its opinion in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United States, 10 CIT 510, 643 F. Supp. 1128 (1986) the Court upheld plaintiffs claim that protests had been timely filed, overturned the classification of the importations and found that the Customs Service had improperly assigned to one entry the values of merchandise which was properly attributable to 21 entries.
The Court did not deal with a counterclaim by the government that if the Court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Fabil Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999