Legal Opinion

State v. McConnell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 2013No. 68852-9-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 The 10-year statute of limitations for rape in the first degree begins on the date of commission of the crime or 1 year from the date “on which the identity of the suspect is conclusively established by deoxyribonucleic acid [(DNA)] testing . . . , whichever is later.”1 Michael William McConnell appeals his conviction for rape in the first degree, arguing the State did not charge him within the 10-year statute of limitations. In the alternative, McConnell claims the delay in filing the charges violated due process. Because DNA testing did not conclusively establish the identity of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, App/cross-respondent v. Daniel L. Keen, Resp/crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State of Washington v. Clayton Gene StaffordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API